Free Trial
Forgot your password?

Questions? Call us at 800-207-8001

  • HOME
  • WHITE HOUSE
  • POLITICS
  • CONGRESS
  • DOMESTIC POLICY
  • NATIONAL SECURITY
  • TECH
  • COLUMNS
    • Political Connections by Ronald Brownstein
    • The Cook Report by Charlie Cook
    • Off to the Races by Charlie Cook
    • Vantage Point
    • Common Sense by Matthew Dowd
    • On The Trail by Reid Wilson
    • Against the Grain by Josh Kraushaar
    • Rules of the Game by Eliza Newlin Carney
    • Gwen's Take by Gwen Ifill
    •  
  • BLOGS
    • On Call
    • Tech Daily Dose
    • Voices
    • Expert Blogs
  • POLLS
    • Politics
    • Congress
    • Energy
    • National Security
  • EVENTS

The Cole Burrrrr Report

December 15, 2005 | 3:20 PM |
Share Share

OK Rep. Tom Cole, a former RNC executive director, is telling colleagues that Republicans can prevent losses in the 2006 midterm elections if they successfully define Democrats as carping critics who favor surrender in Iraq, higher taxes and more government spending.

In a memo he plans to send to House Republicans later today, Cole, who wants to join the caucus leadership next year as chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, writes bluntly that Democrats could win seats in the House next November,, and that "history suggests we face an uphill battle next year."

"I believe our voters respond best when they think everything is on the line -- and our House majority is on the line in each and every election that we fight," Cole writes.

Cole suggests stirring up "a little paranoia" among Republican base voters to motivate them to vote.

"I cannot make this point strongly enough. There are no inevitable victories in politics and complacency is the precursor of defeat."

Cole's prescription: Force Democrats "to defend the solutions they are offering to the American people -- higher taxes and bigger government at home combined with defeat and retreat abroad. Since they won't spell out their agenda to the American people we must do it for them." {MARC AMBINDER]

Full memo after the jump.


To: Republican Colleagues
From: Tom Cole
Date: December 15, 2005
Re: Defining the Democrats
As this year comes to a close and we begin to look forward to what most likely will be the most challenging election cycle in recent years, I would like to share some thoughts I have had concerning how we deal with our Democratic opponents in the coming year.

Collectively and individually the Democrats have decided to talk about the Bush Administration and us rather than present their own alternative vision of where the country should go in the coming years. They have done this for two reasons. First, they have deep internal divisions that they would rather not reveal to the public. Second, they know that the public rejects the core beliefs of the majority of their party -- higher taxes, bigger government and surrender in Iraq.

Those core beliefs were visible to American voters to some degree in the presidential election of 2000 and even more dramatically in the form of an obstructionist Democratic Senate in 2002 and the liberal Kerry candidacy of 2004. They will be visible again in 2008 when Democrats are forced to define themselves over the course of a presidential campaign. However, in 2006 we will have to define the Democrats since they will steadfastly refuse to do it themselves.

Elections between candidates and parties are about clarifying choices for voters. And, as my old friend the late Lee Atwater used to say, when you are in a campaign you "must define or be defined". You should talk about your opponent and his positions as much as you talk about yourself and your own positions. That is something we have not done consistently this year.

In 2006 I think we should repeatedly remind the American people of these three things about our opponents:

1) DEMOCRATS FAVOR HIGHER TAXES. You will not find many Americans that will tell you, please take more of my of my hard earned money. They might say, take some more of someone else's money, but they don't volunteer their own. Americans want lower taxes. Our party believes in lower taxes and we should be vocal about it. When Republicans recently lowered taxes, the economy grew, the deficit declined and American families had more money in their pockets. The facts are on our side.

2) DEMOCRATS FAVOR HIGHER GOVERNMENT SPENDING. As we have seen in recent months, Americans are concerned about government spending and the size of the government. Republicans understand this. We are the party of small government. Just recently we voted to lower the percentage of government spending by just 0.1 percent. Not one Democrat voted for this reduction in spending. Where were the Blue Dogs? They were on the side of bigger government and more spending. Those dogs may bark, but they don't hunt.

3) DEMOCRATS FAVOR SURRENDER IN IRAQ. Frankly, Jack Murtha and Nancy Pelosi did us a favor when they placed their party on record favoring an immediate pull out from Iraq regardless of the consequences. This allows us to paint the picture about what failure in Iraq would entail for Iraqis, for America and for the cause of freedom and democracy around the world. Unlike the confused voices on the left, the Republican message on this front is simple, straightforward and honest. Americans want to succeed in a mission that they think is justified and morally right. The President believes this, the troops serving in Iraq believe this and the public does too.

Next year we should not let the Democrats get away with being critics as opposed to problem solvers. They must be forced to defend the solutions they are offering to the American people -- higher taxes and bigger government at home combined with defeat and retreat abroad. Since they won't spell out their agenda to the American people we must do it for them.

We have had a tremendously successful year legislatively -- an energy bill, a highway bill, CAFTA, bankruptcy reform, class action reform, spending restraint -- and there is more to come this year and next. Moreover, despite the difficulties, the recent election and the progress Iraqis have made in defending themselves shows we are on the right path in that recently liberated country. Ours is a productive majority with bold ideas. The Democratic minority is a crowd of critics that have learned nothing and forgotten nothing during their long stint in the political wilderness.

History suggests that we face an uphill battle next year, but I believe our message when contrasted to that of our Democratic opponents wins with the American people every time. So, while we offer Americans our positive and optimistic vision next year, let's never hesitate to remind the voters who our opponents are, what they believe, and what they will do if they capture the majority next year.

Finally, let's not be afraid to say that the Democrats could win, that the stakes are high and that victory at the polls is not automatic. The Democrats are determined to defeat us next year and a little paranoia on the part of our supporters is not a bad thing when it comes motivating and turning out our base.

Our House majority has been the driving force for change in America for over a decade. We still have much to do. Let's resolve in 2006 to stay on the offensive, define our Democratic opponents and work together to confound the pundits and demonstrate that there truly is a governing GOP majority in America.

Permalink
Join the Discussion
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus

 

Advertisement

Search This Blog


Archives

Monthly Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005

Recent Posts

  • Q Poll: Menendez Leads Kyrillos By Ten
  • What Deb Fischer's Upset in Nebraska Means
  • Fischer Wins Republican Senate Primary in Nebraska
  • Two Ways of Looking At Pence's First Ad
  • Durant Gets Support From an Unlikely Source
  • RGA Ties Dalton to Perdue in First Ad
  • The 'Amateurish' Ads for Rep. Howard Berman
  • The First Gay Late-Night Host, Obama Golfs With Biden, and Mitt Commits Pranks--VIDEO
  • Hotline Sort: A Cornhusker Comeback
  • Where Obama And Barrett Diverge in Wisconsin

Recent Comments

  • Time for Change on Congressional Insiders Eye Federal Employee Pensions
  • Wren on Video: Romney/Palin the Perfect Ticket for 2012?
  • dcguy on Reality Check: How Republican Is NY-26?
  • stephen blair on Palin Ignites The Field
  • da on Reality Check: How Republican Is NY-26?
  • BB on Congressional Insiders Eye Federal Employee Pensions
  • pam on GOP Senate Targets Keep Their Distance From Ryan
  • Jenny on Saving Private Ryan
  • bonncaruso on Reality Check: How Republican Is NY-26?
  • Joe on Saving Private Ryan

On Call Blogroll
  • Blogometer
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • The Page
  • The Fix
  • The Corner
  • The Note
  • MSNBC's First Read
  • The Huffington Post
  • The Daily Beast
  • Lynn Sweet
  • NYT's The Caucus
  • Politico's Ben Smith
  • ABC's Jake Tapper
  • The Drudge Report
  • RedState
  • Daily Kos
  • Ross Douthat
  • AmSpec blog
  • Townhall
  • Ezra Klein
  • Instapundit
  • Power Line
  • Michelle Malkin
  • TPM's Election Central
  • Crooks & Liars
  • Blue Hampshire
  • Matthew Iglesias
  • Think Progress
  • Political Wire
About

Contact On Call:

  • E-mail: ssullivan@nationaljournal.com
  • Gchat: Seansullivan07
  • Twitter: HotlineSean

Staff

Reid Wilson, Editor-in-Chief
Sean Sullivan, Editor
Julie Sobel, Deputy Editor

Contributing Editors:
Josh Kraushaar and Quinn McCord
Contributing Writers:
Steven Shepard, Dan Roem, Tim Alberta, Stephanie Palla, Sarah Mimms, Kevin Brennan, Chris Peleo-Lazar and Scott Bland



Disclaimer

On Call editors reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments. The Hotline, National Journal Group, Inc. and Atlantic Media Company are not responsible for the content of the comments that remain.


Latest On Blogs

HEALTHCARE

Can Democrats Turn the Health Debate to Their Advantage?

April 28, 2011

EDUCATION

Dispiriting Numbers on Education, Civil Rights

July 5, 2011

ECONOMY

Transforming the Highway Trust Fund

February 22, 2011

ENERGY

Extreme Weather and Climate Change: What's the Link?

July 5, 2011

TRANSPORTATION

The Environmental Case for Transportation Investment

July 5, 2011

SECURITY

Will President Obama's Afghanistan Strategy Prove Effective?

June 27, 2011

HOTLINEONCALL

Only 18,000 Jobs Added in June, Less Than One Fifth of Analyst Estimates

July 8, 2011

TECHDAILYDOSE

Rain Still Threatening Shuttle Launch

July 8, 2011

VOICES

John Edwards: The Latest In a Pathetic Parade

May 25, 2011

 

National Journal Group
Sections
  • Home
  • White House
  • National
    Security
  • Congress
  • Politics
  • Domestic
    Policy
Columnists
  • Political Connections by Ronald Brownstein
  • The Cook Report by Charlie Cook
  • Off to the Races by Charlie Cook
  • Vantage Point
  • Common Sense by Matthew Dowd
  • On The Trail by Reid Wilson
  • Against the Grain by Josh Kraushaar
  • Rules of the Game by Eliza Newlin Carney
Company
  • About Us
  • Staff Bios
  • Employment
  • Reprints & Back Issues
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Copyright 2012 by National Journal Group Inc. • The Watergate 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037
phone 202-739-8400 • fax 202-833-8069 • NationalJournal.com is an Atlantic Media publication.