New Hampshire Poll RumorsWe've got some unconfirmed numbers lifted from a prominent NH-based pollster (not ARG) that apparently show Hillary Clinton with just a single digit lead over John Edwards. We've got the numbers but nothing else; If we find more, we'll post. [CHUCK TODD] UPDATE: The rumored pollster has since told us these leaked numbers weren't from their poll. 8 Comments |
Experts: Energy & Environment
Should We Start Swapping Coal For Gas?Latest response: David ParkerNovember 06, 2009 2:16 pmExperts: National Security
Chi-America: Is This The New Global Order?Latest response: Paul SullivanNovember 06, 2009 11:00 amExperts: Transportation
How Can We Promote Greater Awareness Of Transportation Safety?Latest response: Robert L. DarbelnetNovember 06, 2009 3:48 pm   
Amy Walter, Editor-in-Chief 
On Call editors reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments. The Hotline, National Journal Group, Inc. and Atlantic Media Company are not responsible for the content of the comments that remain. |
Why are you holding the numbers back?!
New Hampshire is a landmine for Hillary. They like to upset the apple cart. That's why her people are trying to change the primary calendar.
I would be very skeptical of any poll that shows anyone within striking distance of Hillary. She is, by every measure, the front runner. Maybe Dick Morris conducted the poll?
I would be very skeptical of any poll that shows anyone within striking distance of Hillary. She remains, by every measure, the front runner. Maybe Dick Morris conducted the poll?
Apparently Warner is in second in SC according to a new poll.
Watch out - he's coming, and he'll have $100 million to spend. Name ID isn't an issue for him/.
I say give us Warner and Edwards in 2008 and the Republicans will go down for a decade at least.
It's time to get real. Forget Hilary, forget Kerry, give us somebody who can WIN.
Have warner pay john mcCain $50m to not run, then Hillary can win
The perception Hillary is far out front is wrong. It's still early, and Hillary is benefiting from hype created by celebrity status. John Edwards has a real health care plan, and a plan to pay for it, Clinton doesn't. Edwards apologized for the war, Clinton hasn't. There's no substance to HRC's candidacy. Serious voters will see that come election time. John Edwards may not be a polished liberal, but he is a true Democrat, who can win the WHITE HOUSE, not just the Primary.