Rudy Giuliani was on "Hannity & Colmes":
Asked if he should be congratulated or consoled: "A little of both, but mostly congratulations. It's wonderful thing to be, you know, organizing and putting together. And it's a little -- very humbling to think that running for president of the United States is a kid from Brooklyn. It's quite a step."
More: "We still have to formally announce it and do a few more things. But this is about as close as you're going to get."
On critics saying he's too different from the GOP: "I don't think anyone has campaigned much more than I have for Republican candidates, going back to 1998. I mean, I've been in 45 states on behalf of 200 candidates, all Republicans. Sometimes differences on issues here and there, but the same basic philosophy of strong foreign policy, being on offense against terrorism, smaller government, lower taxes. And in my case, those are things that I did."
More: "Those are very conservative. And on the issues where, you know, sometimes -- of course there are disagreements. I mean, you never agree with any one candidate 100 percent."
On where he stands on abortion: "Where I stand on abortion is, I oppose it. I don't like it. I hate it. I think abortion is something that, as a personal matter, I would advise somebody against. However, I believe in a woman's right to choose. I think you have to ultimately not put a woman in jail for that, and I think ultimately you have to leave that to a disagreement of conscience and you have to respect the choice that somebody makes. So what I do say to conservatives, because then, you know, you want to look at, well, OK, what can we look to that is similar to the way we think? I think the appointment of judges that I would make would be very similar to, if not exactly the same as, the last two judges that were appointed."
More: "I don't think you have a litmus test. But I do think you have sort of a general philosophical approach that you want from a justice, and I think a strict constructionist would be probably the way I'd describe it."
On partial-birth abortion ban: "If it doesn't have a provision for the life of the mother, then I wouldn't support the legislation. If it has provision for the life of the mother, then I would support it."
On gay marriage: "Marriage should be between a man and a woman. Here's exactly the position I've always had. And I feel the same way about it today that I did eight, 10 years ago when I signed the domestic partnership legislation: Marriage should be between a man and a woman. It should remain that way. ... I thought the best answer was domestic partnership as a way of dealing with that, so that you're recognizing the rights of people who are gay and lesbian and protect them. But marriage should remain between a man and a woman."
Asked who's the bigger Yankee fan, him or HRC: "Well, we could do a debate on Yankee trivia and find out."
On the Dem candidates: "I think they're all, you know, worthy people, and they're all people that are going to fight it out for the Democratic nomination. And I haven't the foggiest idea which one's going to win. Right now, it looks like Hillary."
On the GOPers: "Very good men, all very, very good men, very worthy men, very good men."
More: "I'm in this to win" (FNC, 2/5).
MORE TAXES, NO WORRY
John Edwards was in the "Situation Room":
Asked if his raising taxes comment would hurt him: "My view is that the single most important characteristic of the next president of the United States is somebody who's decent and honest with the country. No one can propose universal health care and say they can pay for it without doing anything to the tax structure. That is not the truth. And I think the American people deserve and are entitled to the truth, that I suspect the will be other Democratic candidates as we go forward who will follow the lead that I've put out there today and will come forward with their own universal health care plan. And if they contend that they can pay for it leaving the tax cuts and the tax structure exactly as it is, I don't believe that's true. And we'll have to hear what they have to say" (CNN, 2/5).
TV GETS ITS SENATE COVERAGE IN ORDER
And there was a lot of action on TV about the action on the Senate floor:
MSNBC's Scarborough: "Republicans killed the debate over this resolution that was offered up by one of the president's former top allies in the Senate, GOP senator John Warner. But even John Warner himself fell meekly in line with the rest of the Republican minority, killing any Senate floor debate about the president's surge that most Republicans oppose" ("Scarborough Country," 2/5).
FNC's Garrett: "Democrats say all of this is an elaborate Republican charade to filibuster an important debate on the Iraq war resolution, and the Iraq troop surge the president has put before the country. Republicans say look, if you want to have a debate and a vote in the Senate, you've got to have a fair process where all, or at least many, ideas are debated, not just one" ("Special Report," 2/5).
CNN's Roberts: "They're going to back to square one with the whole thing" ("AC 360," 2/5). [EMILY GOODIN]