John and Elizabeth Edwards were on "Face the Nation":
Edwards, on saying HRC was making a political calculation about terrorism: "I don't agree that the Republicans would have an advantage. I would never cede that. ... I think we're less safe, not more safe. We have fewer allies and, according to Bush's own State Department, there are more terrorists in the world. So I think we are not safer than we were when George Bush took office or just prior to September 11. And the second issue is, I think when you're talking about something as serious as an attack on the United States of America, particularly if you're a presidential candidate or a president, the focus should not be on politics and on votes. The focus should be on what's going to have to be done to unite America and keep the American people safe. So that's what I was talking about."
Asked if Maliki should resign as PM of Iraq, Edwards: "That's something for them to decide, not for us to decide. But at the end of the day, the real test is, are they moving toward a political compromise? Because there cannot be stability in Iraq without it."
Edwards, on what action cong. Dems should take on Iraq: "They should not submit a single funding bill to the president for the war that doesn't have a timetable for withdrawal. And I think they should use whatever legislative tool is available to them, including a filibuster ... to do everything -- this is not politics. This is about life and death."
E. Edwards: "I have been pretty disturbed about the trend in the political dialogue. If we are arguing about policy and I am saying somebody's health care policy doesn't do this and John's does do what is missing, that's different than the name calling, and that denigrates the whole process, turns people off. We have less people voting, and it's very important to get those people engaged."
Edwards, on what role Elizabeth would play in the WH: "The way we do things and the way we interact is so natural that I would not want to change that. I think titles and specific charges is not the way that we do things together, and I think because of that it doesn't make sense."
E. Edwards: "I presently respect the way things are done, and John has people who speak for him and I'm really supposed to be just a mirror for people to see him. And what I have to say about it honestly is not very important. People will be voting for John. The extent to which I can shed a light on who he is as a person, that's great. I never practiced law with him, partly for some of the reasons that you mentioned, but it doesn't mean that he didn't talk to me about his cases. He always did. I think that the first lady gets a megaphone. She doesn't get a job; she gets a megaphone to talk about the things she cares about. I care about veterans' issues. ... I care about after-school programs. ... I care a great deal about what happens with respect to breast cancer and treatment and research. So I mean, I have a lot, and that doesn't even mention a 7-year-old and a 9-year-old at home."
Asked about a Cabinet post, E. Edwards: "Not only -- I will not accept nor will I ..." (CBS, 8/26).
HOPING FOR A HOT SUMMER
Mike Huckabee was on "Fox News Sunday":
Asked how much money he's raised since Ames: "Three point two million hits to the website. We've scheduled fundraisers in about 16 states now through the middle and end of October. ... I don't know the exact figures and, of course, if I told you, I'd have to take your life, so I couldn't give you that, but it's substantially more. And I think the thing for us is we're seeing a momentum that we just weren't seeing before, people sort of holding back, wondering did we have the traction. And now they have truly begun to understand that our campaign, even with limited resources, had a spectacular showing in Iowa. And they know that with resources there's no reason we couldn't catapult to the front."
Asked why he's still down in the polls: "So far, we've been everything from no shot to long shot now to slingshot. And I think we're at a point where as we look for the next level, is our message is connecting, and it is. The polls really don't reflect the core voters. It reflects name identification, which improves with each debate. It improves with each showing, like Iowa. But what really is showing up -- when we were in New Hampshire last week, everywhere we went we were expecting certain numbers of crowds, maybe 50 people. We'd have 200. So we're seeing anywhere from two to four times the number of people come out and enthusiastically receiving the message that I'm giving."
On where the Club for Growth got their info to run ads against him: "I have to think it may be one of the other candidates. I don't know who and I don't even know why." More: "They essentially operate when people give them money specifically targeted toward someone that they want to take out. They hide behind the anonymity of the organization."
On Fred Thompson: "Let's just hope Fred decides it's just too hot this summer to even do this. Maybe he won't get in. But if he does, I think he's going to suck a lot of the oxygen out of the room when he first comes in. But I'm not sure I'd want to be in his position where the expectations are simply just sky-high for him to be able to perform. You know, I'd rather be in a position to over perform than to get in and then underperform the expectations. And so far, that's what we've done. No one expected us to do as well in Iowa. We've done it. No one was expecting us to draw the kind of crowds and momentum in New Hampshire. We're doing it. People are expecting him to basically come in and be the fifth head on Mount Rushmore. Whether he can live up to that -- I think there's a real challenge for anybody to live up to that, including if Ronald Reagan were to come back. I'm not sure he could live up to Ronald Reagan's persona and image at this stage."
Asked about the VP slot: "I'd like to think I'm presidential material. You know, the point is I've never seen a guy say, 'I'm going to the Olympics and, man, my goal is to be the silver medalist.' Nobody says, 'That's what, you know, I spent my whole life working toward, is being number two.' So, no, I'm not sitting around thinking about, 'Gosh, what if I could be vice president?' I'm thinking about, 'What would happen if I could become president,' how I would lead this country, what I would do to reform taxes, what I would do to try to bring a domestic agenda that builds this country back so we have some strength. And I think the voters are still going to respond to me when they get a chance to hear the message. That's what we're saying and that's what I'm confident they're going to continue to see" ("Fox News Sunday," 8/26).
AGREEING TO DISAGREE
Bill Richardson was on "Late Edition":
On Iraq: "You cannot start a peace process, a reconciliation, a peacekeeping force in Iraq that rebuilds the country without getting all of our troops out with no residual forces."
More: "The Maliki government is falling apart. They're doing very little about bringing reconciliation. The training of the Iraqi troops is at an alarmingly slow pace. You've got Maliki flirting with Iran right now. I mean, is this guy our ally? This is an incompetent government, and now we're starting to shift the blame to the Maliki government. So I believe the best step is a withdrawal, but with a diplomatic plan that brings the three Iraqi entities together in a possible partition, in an all-Muslim peacekeeping force, in division of oil revenues, a sharing of power. The Maliki government is doing nothing, and we are increasing the violence there, making our troops the top targets. This is making no sense."
On HRC saying the surge is working in some areas: "I totally disagree with her. I don't see how she can say that, because the level of violence has increased, particularly in the northern provinces. The number of Iraqi deaths has doubled, almost 62 per day. This has been the deadliest summer on record for U.S. troops. The Maliki government is falling apart.I don't see how she can say that" (CNN, 8/26).
OH THAT ROMNEY
Sam Brownback was also on "Late Edition":
On Iraq: "What you're going to see out of General Petraeus' report middle of September is that there's been very good military progress and little to no political progress. And it's now time, it's past time, that we need to take advantage of the military situation for a political surge and deals to be made in Iraq for stability."
More: "Maliki is a product of the system. I think you've got to look at that systems change is really the key here for us to look forward to the future, get something that's more durable."
Asked what he thinks of the late "nuance" in Romney's abortion position: "I'm not sure what to really make of it. I'm appreciative of his changes on life issues. My point of view has been ... that it's hard to lead a nation on such a tough social issue, moral issue, if you don't have conviction on it yourself" (CNN, 8/26).
SOON TO BE SEPTEMBER
Sen. John Warner (R-VA): "I put this out as a suggestion and put it in the public domain. It's drawn a lot of controversy, I recognize that. But this will help the American people better understand the complexity of the many issues that are going to be brought up to the president first by the ambassador, a very able man, coming back from Iraq; General Petraeus, the overall on-scene commander; General Jones, who is preparing a special report on the status of the security forces; and, indeed, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is going to come forward with his views."
More: "What I'm trying to do ... is to get the attention of our president, those making a decision and, indeed, the American public of the necessity to bring some type of decisive pressure upon this government to deliver on the reconciliation. Reconciliation ... can bring about a greater cessation, a greater stability .... throughout Iraq, than all the bullets and the arms together."
Asked if Bush does not set a timetable, if he'll break with him and begin to set one: "I'm going to have to evaluate it and then, as all other senators -- we're an independent branch of our government, co-equal in many respects with authority and responsibility -- we'll have to make our decision as to what we'll do."
More: "I don't say that as a threat, but I say that is an option we all have to consider."
Asked if Sens are worried about Iraq and '08: "Every one of those senators is worried. ... Now, we will see, after we get back in September and we get together in groups and talk amongst each other, we'll have a consensus. ... Maybe others will speak out, as I have done, on options. But we should wait till the president speaks. After he speaks, then we'll have to make our own assessment."
Asked if Bush recommends a status quo in Iraq, if Senate GOPers will rebel: "I'm not going to bite on that one" ("Meet the Press," NBC, 8/26).
Senate Min. Leader Mitch McConnell: "I think the big news in August, frankly, is that the critics of the surge are now going to Iraq over this past month and admitting that the surge is working. So we've had military progress. There's no question about that. ... The Iraqi government is still pretty much a disaster. I mean, they haven't done any of the things at the central government level that we had anticipated."
More: "Senator Warner called me Friday afternoon to underscore that he still supports the president, that he is not in favor of a surrender date. And even though he made a recommendation that we begin to draw down some level of troops, frankly, I think a lot of my members would be surprised if there was not some level of draw down over the next coming months. So I didn't find that all that newsworthy" ("Fox News Sunday," 8/26).
Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA), on Warner: "I think that this was a bold step forward, and he's trying to send the same signal that ... you can't rely on us forever. We need American combat troops off the streets in Iraq, and we need Iraqis to replace them" ("This Week," ABC, 8/26).
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX): "I support the surge because I believe the surge is helping to make us safer, given us a chance of success rather than a guaranteed failure which a rapid redeployment or withdrawal would guarantee" ("This Week," ABC, 8/26).
TURNING THE TABLES ON RUSSERT
Warner also discussed whether he's going to run for re-election:
Asked if he's going to run for re-election, Warner: "Well, what do you think I should do?" More: "Yeah, how about that? Come on. You put yourself up as the number one nation's political pundit."
NBC's Russert: "Never do."
Warner: "What would you do if you were 80 years old?"
Russert: "I just ask the questions."
Warner: "You do? Well, I'll give you the answer. Wait till September."
Russert: "That's five days away."
Warner: "That's all right. Wait till September."
More: "I made a commitment. This is serious business. ... Five terms, the people of Virginia have stood with me strongly. Now I've got to go out and assess, and each day for six months, I've kept a little diary. I feel this way -- not physically, but mentally -- should I stay, should I not. But the Senate requires you to go full-bore six or seven days a week, tremendous energy. Go to Iraq, jump in and out of helicopters, get on the cargo planes, no sleep. And that's in different things we've got to do all around. And I've got to assess at this age whether it is fair to Virginia to ask for a contract for another six years."
Russert: "That sounds like a lot to ask a man between the ages of 80 and 86."
Warner: "That is correct." More: "But anyway, I'm going to make that decision, and I'm going to do what's right for my state and my country in terms of running again. I'm confident that I can run a good, strong campaign. But then I've got to also say to Virginia, 'On the eve of my 88th birthday, I'm still going seven days, seven nights with full steam.' I might be able to do it" ("Meet the Press," NBC, 8/26).
ROUNDTABLE ROUNDUP
The "Fox News Sunday" roundtable discussed WH '08 and Iraq.
The "Meet the Press" roundtable discussed the situation in the Middle East.
The "Late Edition" roundtable discussed WH '08.
The "This Week" roundtable discussed the situation in Iraq and WH '08.