Richards On Women's Health, Abortion In The Obama Era

I recently interviewed Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards via email about her expectations of the policy differences between the Bush and Obama administrations on reproductive health issues and abortion rights. As thousands gather on the National Mall today -- the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade -- for the March for Life, here are Richards' thoughts about which Bush initiatives should be reversed.
JS: The Bush era has been friendly to the anti-abortion community. Over the last eight years, Bush has reinstated the global gag rule, which restricts federal funding to overseas groups that provide abortion services, and his administration has advocated for abstinence-only education efforts. During his tenure, the Supreme Court upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. President Obama has said he would sign the Freedom of Choice Act, limiting restrictions on abortion procedures. The choice community is looking to undo many of Bush's initiatives restricting access to abortions. So, what are the priorities for Planned Parenthood and like-minded groups for the earlier months of Barack Obama's first term?
CR: Planned Parenthood is first and foremost a health care provider. Each year, Planned Parenthood provides approximately five million women, men and adolescents with health care and education services worldwide. And with many Americans seeking affordable health care services, the eight years of the Bush administration have been devastating. With President Obama, we have a president who will work to ensure that women's health is a priority and that women have access to comprehensive and affordable health care services.
We look forward to working with President Obama on three critical women's health priorities:
First, we need commonsense policies that reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and teen pregnancies. We can do this by expanding family planning programs, restoring affordable birth control for college health clinics and low-income clinics, and investing in age-appropriate, medically accurate sex education and rejecting dangerous, ineffective abstinence-only programs.
Second, we must expand access to affordable family planning and prevention care, both domestically and internationally. That means increasing funding for Title X, the nation's family planning program; investing in cost-effective preventive health care, such as breast cancer screenings and Pap tests; reversing the global gag rule and restoring funding for the UN Population Fund, which both provide valuable family planning work internationally; and overturning Bush's midnight HHS regulation that would limit the rights of patients to receive complete and accurate health care information.
Third, we need to make sure that everyone has access to affordable, quality health care, especially women. Women are adversely affected by the soaring costs of health care. According to studies, women of childbearing age spend 68 percent more in out-of-pocket health care costs than men, in part because of reproductive health-related supplies and services. Planned Parenthood is also increasingly seeing more and more women who have no health insurance and can't afford it.
JS: Obama has said that he would sign FOCA as one of his first acts in office. In the time since he made that campaign trail pledge, however, the economy has tanked, unemployment has increased and several industries sit on the brink of financial ruin. Can the President afford to tackle policy matters related to abortion, long a divisive social issue, early in his administration?
CR: President Obama understands that the time has come to bring people together around commonsense solutions to reduce unintended pregnancies. The vast majority of Americans want government to focus on solving problems, such as increasing access to affordable health care, investing in prevention care, and helping children stay healthy and safe and not become parents before they are ready.
Planned Parenthood will work with the President to address the immediate problems that women are facing: access to affordable health care, reducing unintended and teen pregnancy, and investing in preventive health care. The Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) would codify and protect a women's right to choose by securing women's access to reproductive health care services under federal law. It is one item on a long list of priorities that the Obama administration will have to tackle to reverse the damage of the past eight years.
JS: What's your advice for Obama about how he should shape his health care proposal to include coverage for reproductive health services such as Pap smears and breast exams? Should he push for contraception to be covered as well? What about the morning after pill?
CR: Investing in preventive health services such as Pap smears, family planning and breast exams not only saves lives, it's a smart economic investment, particularly during these difficult economic times. President Obama understands this and we believe his health care proposal will put women's health care needs first. First, this means increasing access to high-quality, affordable care.
The President has also said that any comprehensive health care plan should cover contraception to reduce unintended pregnancies. Contraception is basic health care: 98 percent of women use birth control at some point in their life, and 27 states require insurance companies that cover prescription drugs to cover the full-range of FDA-approved contraceptives. [LINK] Plan B, which is also contraception, should also be covered. Planned Parenthood is also holding Women's Health Matters Conversations across the country, engaging our supporters and taking part in the grassroots effort to reform our nation's health care system and build support for a comprehensive health care plan.
JS: Is there room for abstinence education in our schools' comprehensive sex education programs?
CR: Yes. Abstinence education already is a part of comprehensive sex education. All credible studies, including one funded by Congress have shown that abstinence-only programs don't work, and don't delay when teens have sex. In our society, teens need honest and accurate information so they can make responsible decisions. As the mother of two teenagers, I know it can be difficult to talk with your kids about sex. We need education programs in our schools that will keep teens healthy -- by including information about abstinence as well as contraception, healthy communication, responsible decision making, and prevention of sexually transmitted infections. It's time to put money toward real solutions that will help prevent sexually transmitted infections and teen pregnancies.
(JENNIFER SKALKA)





have read the nonsense above. This is the presentation always presented by (PPH) Planned Parenthood but, their underlying goal is to perform abortions in the end! The first thing is being up front and truthful with our teenagers and teaching responsiblity and hold them accountable for the actions they choose in life. The ignorance that is plaguing our nations of not understanding their bodies, what a family is, as well as, entering into positive relationships; coupled with the music they listen too, and the thing presented on TV; are subtil ways our children are being drawn into thinking they live in a fantasy world (make believe). Scripture states: "That our children our wiser but, weaker." Unless we as mature parents and concerned citizens; we must begin to tell them the truth(telling them we didn't do all right either), taking time to listen to our teens concerns, and become involved in their lives; we will continue to see and get what we have been getting. It is time to remove TV's out of every room back into one, and bring back the family times were we see each other, communicate with each other,eat with each other,and enjoy each other, encourage our children, and let them know that they are somebody,and encouraging them we will continue to loose them to the world's devices of making unpoular decisions, of unwanted or unplanned pregancies, alcohol,drugs, etc. because of wrong choices.
Then intellectually and practically, we should be striving to make abstinence-only education more effective and streamline the adoption process, rather than compromise the sanctity of life by promoting abortions as an easy alternative via federal funding.
As an older female coming of age in the 50's and birthing 4 children by 24yr old, I have had many conversations with others re: the abortion issue. At no time has anyone of them condoned abortion as a means of birth control, frequent abortions have been known to be dangerous. I don't see PP as an organization whose "underlying goal" is to perform abortion. The decision to have an abortion is never an easy choice but in some cases it is warranted. To suggest that laws should be enacted to return us to the days before Roe vs Wade is an appalling concept. Back alley butchers etc were the only option for those without the necessary funds to be treated by a willing Dr. competent to perform one in a safe manner. I don't believe President Obama is in favor of reversing the Supreme Courts decision on PB abortion, if one reads the bill or bills he voted against while a senator you will see he was objecting to the wording and some details of the bill not to reversing the decision. And as far as abstinence only education, that's proved to be very ineffective. My issue with pro-life enthusiasts is that not only are they opposed to abortion but to any usefull sex education, birth control measure, etc. Without the availability of free birth control access I would have been obliged to bring many more children into a family already burdened with addiction and poverty. Instead, I was able to find a way to get a better education that has provided me with a profession that afforded me the means to raise my children out of poverty and offer them more than continued years of welfare and humiliation.
Telling teenagers and adults to abstain from sexual activity isn't enough, the record backs that up very well.
As an older female coming of age in the 50's and birthing 4 children by 24yr old, I have had many conversations with others re: the abortion issue. At no time has anyone of them condoned abortion as a means of birth control, frequent abortions have been known to be dangerous. I don't see PP as an organization whose "underlying goal" is to perform abortion. The decision to have an abortion is never an easy choice but in some cases it is warranted. To suggest that laws should be enacted to return us to the days before Roe vs Wade is an appalling concept. Back alley butchers etc were the only option for those without the necessary funds to be treated by a willing Dr. competent to perform one in a safe manner. I don't believe President Obama is in favor of reversing the Supreme Courts decision on PB abortion, if one reads the bill or bills he voted against while a senator you will see he was objecting to the wording and some details of the bill not to reversing the decision. And as far as abstinence only education, that's proved to be very ineffective. My issue with pro-life enthusiasts is that not only are they opposed to abortion but to any usefull sex education, birth control measure, etc. Without the availability of free birth control access I would have been obliged to bring many more children into a family already burdened with addiction and poverty. Instead, I was able to find a way to get a better education that has provided me with a profession that afforded me the means to raise my children out of poverty and offer them more than continued years of welfare and humiliation.
Telling teenagers and adults to abstain from sexual activity isn't enough, the record backs that up very well.
blackcoptermedia.com will be force on this issue, one of he writers is a friend of mine and is going to write an article titled global genocide,
which will call abortion like he sees it genocide.
check out the site they just came out after the election, so they are new. They are very pro-life.
be patient for this crew has day jobs and families to raise they do it in their spare time, I wish them well.
Why doesn't PP just stop aborting babies and do comprehensive sex ed, condom selling, and female health exams? Richards sounds indistinguishable from the other intellectual fleas who cannot seem to separate the two. Stop ending young lives, and other policies will gain traction. Right now, it is like subsidizing I.A. Farben, and who wants that?